Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ?? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
Date
Msg-id 4C3D2AAD.60901@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??  (Andras Fabian <Fabian@atrada.net>)
Responses Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
List pgsql-general
On 13/07/10 22:16, Andras Fabian wrote:
> I think I have found the solution. Yes, I now can get constantly high throughput with COPY-to-STDOUT, even if free -m
onlyshows me 82 Mbytes (so no, this solution is not cleaning the cache). Always around 2 3/4 minutes. 
>
> I have compared all the /proc/sys/vm settings on my new machines and the old machines (which never had problems), and
ofcourse found some differences, some new settings etc. (of course, lot of changes can happen between 2.6.26 and
2.6.32).And there was one, which stood out from the mass, because its name reminded me of some functions which I have
alwaysseen in the kernel stack while having congestion_wait: 
>
> - zone_reclaim_mode
> (yes, in the kernel stack there was always also a call to "zone_reclaim").
>
> Interestingly, on the old machine this was set to "0" and on the new machine - obviously per Ubuntu default - to "1"
...What these all means is shortly described here: 
>
> http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_zone_reclaim_mode.html
>
> Then I though, lets give it a try. Nd I set it to "0" on the new server too ... and voila, it is running at high
speedin COPY-to-STDOUT. I can even switch back and forth between 0 and 1 and see, how congestion_wait comes back or
disappears.
>
> Now, someone with big kernel know-how could try to describe me in detail, what exactly could be at odds here.
>
> But for me it is now obvious, that I will put in my start up settings a change of "zone_reclaim_mode = 0".
>
> And tomorrow I will see how my nightly backup runs with this setting.

It sounds like it's time for a post to the Linux Kernel Mailing List,
and/or a Launchpad bug against the Ubuntu kernel.

Make sure to have your asbestos undewear on if posting to LKML ;-)

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.4, XPath and name() function
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??