Re: performance on new linux box - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: performance on new linux box
Date
Msg-id 4C35E4CA020000250003327E@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance on new linux box  (Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>)
Responses Re: performance on new linux box  (Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com> wrote:

> One thing I don't understand is why BBU will result in a huge
> performance gain.  I thought BBU was all about power failures?

Well, it makes it safe for the controller to consider the write
complete as soon as it hits the RAM cache, rather than waiting for
persistence to the disk itself.  It can then schedule the writes in
a manner which is efficient based on the physical medium.

Something like this was probably happening on your non-server
machines, but without BBU it was not actually safe.  Server class
machines tend to be more conservative about not losing your data,
but without a RAID controller with BBU cache, that slows writes down
to the speed of the rotating disks.

-Kevin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ben Chobot
Date:
Subject: Re: performance on new linux box
Next
From: Ryan Wexler
Date:
Subject: Re: performance on new linux box