Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database
Date
Msg-id 4C2BF79F.3010001@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 06/30/2010 05:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> And at any rate, the per-database thing isn't really the design goal,
> anyway.

FWIW, I've run into more than one client where PITR and/or warm standby
on a per-database level would be a killer feature.

Joe

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database