Re: extensible enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: extensible enum types
Date
Msg-id 4C1C0871.8080500@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extensible enum types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>> And how would it be per data-type?
>>     
>
> Well, there'd be two kinds of enums, just as you were saying before.
> I'm not sure how we'd expose that to users exactly, or whether there
> could be provisions for switching a type's behavior after creation.
>
>             
>   

I'd be a whole lot happier if we didn't have to do that. I've been 
trying to wrack my brain for some clever way to avoid it (so far without 
success).

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: extensible enum types
Next
From: "mac_man2005@hotmail.it"
Date:
Subject: Re: About tapes