Re: Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives
Date
Msg-id 4C162DAB.6010904@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives  (Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
Jeff Amiel wrote:
> Recently migrated to a shiny new 8.4.4 postgres instance....data stored on attached storage array.  Transaction logs
storedon 2 local mirrored drives (local to the database server itself) for best performance. 
>

Have you benchmarked that this really helps?  Splitting the WAL out onto
a drive pair can help a lot in some cases, but given a large attached
array the improvement tends to be minimal relative to just lumping those
writes in with the rest of the array.  The easy way out of your problem
is to just not put the WAL on the local drives, and instead use them for
things like temp file storage.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Hosting without pgcrypto functions. There are other solutions?
Next
From: John Gage
Date:
Subject: Re: Hosting without pgcrypto functions. There are other solutions?