Re: SR slaves and .pgpass - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date
Msg-id 4C120C72.5000607@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>> "localhost" is used.
>
> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.

Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I 
made them better, not worse.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leonardo F
Date:
Subject: Re: Error with GIT Repository
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum_defer_cleanup_age