On 15/05/10 05:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010:
>
>
>> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious
>> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a
>> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the
>> DATABASE item.
>>
>> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l
>> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that
>> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments?
>>
> +1
>
Was this discussed change made? Was it backported, or only applied to head?
Thanks
Russell
