Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 4C0AD180.90607@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL  (Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>)
Responses Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL  (Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Jon Schewe wrote:
> The tests were all done on an opensuse 11.2 64-bit machine,
> on the same hard drive (just ran mkfs between each test) on the same
> input with the same code base.

So no controller card, just the motherboard and a single hard drive?  If
that's the case, what you've measured is which filesystems are safe
because they default to flushing drive cache (the ones that take around
15 minutes) and which do not (the ones that take >=around 2 hours).  You
can't make ext3 flush the cache correctly no matter what you do with
barriers, they just don't work on ext3 the way PostgreSQL needs them to.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: slow query
Next
From: Jon Schewe
Date:
Subject: Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL