ROFL!!
That's funny... We're spam but he requested and validated the email
address to receive the list emails.
On 06/02/2010 03:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> hmmm. the listadmin may wanna poke this guy for using lame
> whitelisting. sadly, the headers give no clue who the recipient was,
> other than th domain pricom.com.au
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
>> From - Wed Jun 02 14:34:16 2010
> Return-Path: <pgsql-general-owner+M163694@postgresql.org>
> Received: from prix.pricom.com.au (203-206-181-78.perm.iinet.net.au
> [203.206.181.78])
> by hogranch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id o52LW2n26519
> for <pierce@hogranch.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:32:03 -0700
> Received: (qmail 26496 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2010 21:31:56 -0000
> Message-ID: <20100602213156.26494.qmail@prix.pricom.com.au>
> Date: Thu Jun 3 07:31:56 EST 2010
> From: postmaster@pricom.com.au
> To: pierce@hogranch.com
> Subject: Put me on your white list
> Status:
>
> I'm sorry, but your mail:
>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Exception while accessing database
>
> was considered possible spam and was quarantined.
>
> If you are a real mailer, simply hit "Reply" to this message and send
> it without changing the Subject, and you will be put on the Pricom white
> list.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience caused but this measure is necessary to
> combat the flood of unsolicited email.
>
> Postmaster.
>
> Srejector: 20100603.073156
>
>
>
>
