On 26/05/10 20:59, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 21:54, alvherre<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> You sure you don't prefer a GIT repo? pgfoundry doesn't seem very
>> appropriate for this kind of stuff. Too heavyweight and you won't be
>> using most of the (mis)features anyhow.
>
> Oh yeah, +1 on that as one who would probably at least want to *read* it :-)
I was thinking of having javascript-enabled versions of the docs for the
last 2/3 releases on the foundry site (for end-users). Does github (or
alternative) offer website-related stuff too, or just the repository?
Of course that was on the principle that it was going to be separate
from the official docs - if it's going to be on postgresql.org then
we're looking at a different proposition.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
