Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry
Date
Msg-id 4BF57EB7.8050701@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/20/2010 01:58 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 01:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I notice that there are more than a few projects on pgfoundry that are
>> marked as "BSD licence" but then the project files don't contain any
>> mention of the licence details. In some cases, projects are also clearly
>> marked Copyright of people or organizations.
> 
> yeah, this is due to one of many bugs with gForge.  The submitter is
> required to choose a license on submission of a project request ... but
> that information is then discarded and doesn't end up in the project page.

huh? that does not make any sense at all - the licence the submitter
chooses _IS_ displayed on the main overview page of the project (see for
example: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbouncer/).


Stefan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: PGBuildfarm member colugos Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to StartDb-C:3 failure
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry