Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Why do the release notes say this, under plperl:
>> * PL/Perl subroutines are now given names (Tim Bunce)
>> This is for the use of profiling and code coverage tools. DIDN'T
>> THEY HAVE NAMES BEFORE?
>>
>
>
>> If whoever put this in the release notes had bothered to ask I am sure
>> we would have been happy to explain.
>>
>
> You don't need to complain, just fix it. The point of the comment is
> that more explanation is needed.
>
>
>
OK ... I guess I was bothered because this has been referred to in a
public press release about the Beta. The PLPerl security stuff is
missing too, so I'll fix that also.
cheers
andrew
