Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?
Date
Msg-id 4BE85ED3.4010008@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?  (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>)
Responses Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-performance
Ivan,

> Other things could have influenced your result - 260 MB/s vs 300 MB/s is
> close enough to be influenced by data position on (some of) the drives.
> (I'm not saying anything about the original question.)

You misread my post.  It's *87mb/s* vs. 300mb/s.  I kinda doubt that's
position on the drive.

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri
Date:
Subject: Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?