Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Erwin Brandstetter
Subject Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL
Date
Msg-id 4BE81623.4010708@falter.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL (was: Re: Redundant statements)  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: "Compact" and "complete" SQL
List pgadmin-hackers
On 07.05.2010 21:21, dpage@pgadmin.org wrote:
> Sorry - missed that. I generally prefer to only include SQL DDL for
> things that are non-default.

I generally agree. I see the "complete" variant as an option. The
"compact" (non-default SQL DDL) version is what would make my work easier.
However, at the time being we have a mixture. How would you define
"non-default"?

Regards
Erwin

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Quiet logs for frmStatus
Next
From: svn@pgadmin.org
Date:
Subject: SVN Commit by guillaume: r8352 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/frm