Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Date
Msg-id 4BDC8DCA.9040301@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Thomas Løcke <thomas.granvej6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thomas Løcke wrote:
> Anybody know of any recent comparisons made between the two?
>

for purely SQL,  I prefer Postgres by a wide margin.    But, MS SQL
Server comes with a whole infrastructure that includes a lot of powerful
tools, like replication, data extraction and translation, active
directory integrated single sign-on, and so forth.   If you're working
in a pure MS world, with .NOT -er- .NET, etc etc,  its pretty hard to
get away from MS SQL as there are so many tools


the bottom line tends to be driven by whatever the applications
support.   I have one MS SQL database in my lab hosting a program which
only supports MS SQL.   Luckily, the demands on this database are low
enough that i can use the free SQL Express.




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Next
From: Filip Rembiałkowski
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexing queries with bit masks