Re: global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 4BD4B44B.6030406@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to global temporary tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: global temporary tables  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: global temporary tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert,

> (1).  What I *think* it is supposed to mean is that the table is a
> permanent object which is "globally" visible - that is, it's part of
> some non-temp schema like public or $user and it's column definitions
> etc. are visible to all backends - and it's not automatically removed
> on commit, backend exit, etc. - but the *contents* of the table are
> temporary and backend-local, so that each new backend initially sees
> it as empty and can then insert, update, and delete data independently
> of what any other backend does.

While closer to the standard, the above definition is a lot less useful 
than what I believe a lot of people want, which is a table which is 
globally visible, but has no durability; that is, it does not get 
WAL-logged or recovered on restart.  Certainly this latter definition 
would be far more useful to support materialized views.

--                                   -- Josh Berkus                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                           http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inlining SQL functions
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: global temporary tables