Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Also, the "full-database vacuum" terminology seems too likely to be
> interpreted as VACUUM FULL for best results. Perhaps it's worth
> changing that to just "database vacuum" or "vacuum of the entire
> database"
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-12/msg00096.php
It's "database-wide" now instead of "full-database".
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us