Le 05/04/2010 13:48, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 05/04/2010 13:34, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>> On 05.04.2010 09:21, guillaume@lelarge.info wrote:
>>> Le 04/04/2010 22:35, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On 04.04.2010 22:10, guillaume@lelarge.info wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 04/04/2010 21:39, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi developers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seeing as Guillaume is on a roll, fixing bugs faster than I can
>>>>>> open new
>>>>>> tickets, I have found one more, in a feeble attempt to keep up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Group roles are missing for the "Owner" field of properties dialogs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You probably forgot the "Show users for privileges" preference in the
>>>>> Options dialog.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Nope, I don't think we will get away that easily. :p
>>>> I had that option checked, and it works the other way round, too: user
>>>> (login) roles are added to the drop-down "Role", "Privileges" tab.
>>>> The new bug concerns missing group (non-login) roles in the "Owner"
>>>> field, "Properties"-tab.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're definitely right. Next time, I'll read more carefully your bug
>>> report :/
>>>
>>> Anyways, here is a patch to fix this. Do we need an option to
>>> enable/disable this behaviour? I think not, but, as we have one for
>>> priviledges, prefer to ask first before commiting it.
>>>
>>
>> I agree, I would not add another option. If it can confuse you,
>> Guillaume, it surely will confuse others.
>
> Moreover, I don't like adding options like this.
>
>> If it was for me, I would treat login and non-login roles pretty much
>> alike across the program. But that's really a matter of taste.
>
> So do I.
>
Commited.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
