dipti shah wrote:
> Thanks a lot guys but I am not looking for security definer function.
> I know it. My requirements are very complicated and I have to nailed
> down the stuffs by storing schema permissions somewhere, execute my
> store procedure, and restored the stored schema permissions. Like this
> I would make sure that thogh my store procedure manipulates schema
> permissions, at the end, users will have their permissions intact.
>
thats totally the wrong way to do things in SQL.
