Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> Basically, what you feel is missing is documentation that if two
>> shapes share one or more points they are considered to overlap;
>> there is no requirement that they share an area?
>>
>
> Yes, for most people touching != overlap. So it just looks like a bug.
>
>
I guess I must be strange, then, it doesn't strike me as particularly
unnatural. By all means document it, though, if the docs are not clear
on the point.
cheers
andrew
