Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:18 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or, let's put it another way: I've made my opinion clear in the past
>>>> that I think that we ought to ship with a minimal postgresql.conf with
>>>> maybe 15 items in it.
>>> +1
>>>
>> +1 ... but, why the 'top 15'? why not just those that are uncommented to
>> start with, and leave those that are commented out as 'in the docs' ... ?
>>
> +1 to either proposal.
>
If this is turning into a vote: -1 from me for any work on this until
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items is cleared.
It boggles my mind that anyone could have a different prioritization
right now.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
