Re: hardware for a server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: hardware for a server
Date
Msg-id 4B9F3457.1000809@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hardware for a server  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
John R Pierce wrote:
> Vick Khera wrote:
>> Interesting... same advice goes for Adaptec + FreeBSD.  I guess
>> Adaptec + !Windows == bad?
>>
>
> i've never liked adaptec, windows or not.

Yeah, I was trying to be as nice as possible since I don't run Windows
anymore, and for all I know their cards are fine on that OS.  For me, I
just simplify to "Adaptec == bad", but can only tell you specifically
why that is for Linux.

> always been an LSI fan, as far back as when they were NCR Tolerant,
> then later Symbios.   And the AMI Megaraid line, too.

I used to hesitate to recommend them only because their performance used
to lag relative to some of the alternatives--they were more the
"reliable but a bit slower" choice in earlier times.  This is no longer
the case.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Padmanabhan G
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: Package compat-postgresql-libs-4-1PGDG.rhel4.i386.rpm is not signed
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: hardware for a server