Merlin Moncure wrote:
> record->fieldname takes a string (possibly a variable)?
If it doesn't we have a communication problem. :-)
> If so, his would nail the problem.
Not quite, but close. We also need a nice way of querying for field
names (at least) at run time. I've seen that requested several times.
> This would work with run time typed
> records (new, etc)?
>
>
Again, if it doesn't we have a communication problem.
cheers
andrew
