Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4
Date
Msg-id 4B980A5C.3020901@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:02 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> 1. Set up 9.0a4 doing SR replication with a 2nd 9.0a4
>> 2. Ran pgbench for a while.
>> 3. Aborted pgbench with Ctl-C
>> 4. Changed vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in postgresql.conf and reloaded
>> 5. Ran pgbench again, and got:
>>
>> Sidney-Stratton:pg90 josh$ pgbench -c 2 -T 300 bench
>> starting vacuum...WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in
>> relation "pgbench_branches" page 0
>> WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation
>> "pgbench_branches" page 1
>> WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation
>> "pgbench_tellers" page 0
>> WARNING:  PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation
>> "pgbench_tellers" page 1
>
> Understandable.
>
> Time to remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age, I think.

Umm, so what's the bug?

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4