Scott Carey wrote:
> For high sequential throughput, nothing is as optimized as XFS on Linux yet. It has weaknesses elsewhere however.
>
I'm curious what you feel those weaknesses are. The recent addition of
XFS back into a more mainstream position in the RHEL kernel as of their
5.4 update greatly expands where I can use it now, have been heavily
revisiting it since that release. I've already noted how well it does
on sequential read/write tasks relative to ext3, and it looks like the
main downsides I used to worry about with it (mainly crash recovery
issues) were also squashed in recent years.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
