Tom Lane wrote:
> Yes, I think we should narrowly list things we don't want to do.
> The current wording reads like "we aren't interested in adopting any
> MySQL ideas", which I don't think is actually the project consensus,
> not to mention that it doesn't look good from a PR standpoint.
>
>
>
Indeed. We are always open to good ideas, I hope.
The really obvious candidate of missing functionality from MySQL hasn't
even been mentioned in this thread, AFAIK: some form of insert_or_update.
cheers
andrew
