Tom Lane wrote:
> It isn't a table. It's a function, equivalent to CURRENT_USER.
>
> (Both of those are mandated by the SQL spec; we'd certainly never have
> invented functions called without parentheses on our own desires.)
Curioser and curioser. That + SQLA hack == one confused developer trying
to name a seemingly innocent table 'users'. :-)
Thanks to everyone!
Regards,
mk
