Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date
Msg-id 4B850E74020000250002F5F0@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
> Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> scan through the leaf pages.
> 
> That doesn't work because when you split an index page any
> sequential scan in progress will either see the same tuples twice
> or will miss some tuples depending on where the new page is
> allocated. Vacuum has a clever trick for solving this but it
> doesn't work for arbitrarily many concurrent scans.
It sounds like you're asserting that Index Scan nodes are inherently
unreliable, so I must be misunderstanding you.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter.
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables