Jan Urbański wrote:
> Arie Bikker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and
>> others.
>> This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it
>> the right way (hope you agree!).
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the patch has been marked as "Returned with Feedback" on the 6th
> of February, I assume on grounds of prolonged silence about it. I
> confess it was partly my fault, because soon after posting the review I
> suddenly had to focus on other things.
>
> I won't be able to review the new version in the next few days, and this
> commitfest is closing anyway... However I would hate to see that patch
> just disappear, as I think it's useful and you obviously invested some
> work in it.
>
> At this stage I would suggest moving it to the first 9.1 commitfest,
> since it's a nice feature, but not one we should burden the committers
> with this late in the development cycle.
>
> Arie, care to add that last version of the patch to the 2010-Next
> commitfest?
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
I would agree w/ Jan about just adding to 9.1 except that it fixes
several known bugs.
Scott
