Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline
Date
Msg-id 4B73615B.6060700@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline  (david@lang.hm)
List pgsql-performance
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> I'd love to see someone do a comparison of early to mid 2.6 kernels (2.6.18 like RHEL5) to very
> up to date 2.6 kernels.  On fast hardware.

I'd be happy just to find fast hardware that works on every kernel from
the RHEL5 2.6.18 up to the latest one without issues.

--
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: perf problem with huge table
Next
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline