Re: Using the new libpq connection functions in PostgreSQL binaries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Using the new libpq connection functions in PostgreSQL binaries
Date
Msg-id 4B65C309.9080007@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using the new libpq connection functions in PostgreSQL binaries  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/31/2010 09:42 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> I don't find that horrid. AFAICT, that's the only advantage of the
> two-arrays method. By the way, it's that kind of code (keywords
> declaration separated from values declaration) that got commited in the
> previous patch
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-01/msg00398.php).
> I merely used the same code for the other binaries.

Yes, I separated them, because otherwise the compiler complained about
the declaration not being at the top of a block. Of course Tom's other
complaint and this one can both be satisfied by not doing the static
assignment in the declaration.

I'll fix the already committed code and take a look at refactoring this
latest patch. I stand by the two arrays mthod decision though -- I find
combining them into a single array to be unseemly.

Joe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Using the new libpq connection functions in PostgreSQL binaries
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches