Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date
Msg-id 4B5C3581020000250002EB08@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects,
> say 5 million simple functions.
So the current database is expendable?  I'd just as soon delete it
before creating the other one, if you're fairly confident the other
one will do it.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tab completion for prepared transactions?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate