Robert Treat wrote:
> I'm not saying there aren't
> downsides, but having a name the community can unify on is a definite plus, and
> imho that name has to be Postgres.
>
Translation: "we'll only be unified if everyone agrees with me."
Sorry, that is quite clearly not going to happen.
Can we please get on with actually making a better product? Raising this
issue again is simply an unnecessary distraction.
cheers
andrew
