Re: We've broken something in error recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: We've broken something in error recovery
Date
Msg-id 4B5B625B.7000202@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to We've broken something in error recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: We've broken something in error recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> #4  0x4e85b4 in ExceptionalCondition (
>     conditionName=0x1ac4ac "!(nestLevel > 0 && nestLevel <= GUCNestLevel)", 
>     errorType=0x1abf44 "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x1abee4 "guc.c", 
>     lineNumber=3907) at assert.c:57
> #5  0x501f48 in AtEOXact_GUC (isCommit=-86 'ª', nestLevel=84) at guc.c:3907
> #6  0x20618c in AbortTransaction () at xact.c:2194
>
>   

This looks like maybe a corrupted stack - the args to AtEOXact_GUC at 
that location in xact.c are hardwired.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: We've broken something in error recovery
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL