Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>> So add me to the list of people who think that if
>> these are going to be recurring, we should look at moving from
>> cvs to git as soon as 9.0 is released.
>
> The gating factor is not release schedule; it is the still-
> unaddressed tasks that must be done before we can consider moving.
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_from_CVS_to_Git
If you think people can work on that list without risk of delaying
the release, OK. I was assuming that such work would be too
disruptive to work on at this point in a release cycle, and might
possibly pull time from folks who would otherwise be working on the
release. Do you disagree?
-Kevin
