Re: plpython3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: plpython3
Date
Msg-id 4B4E0DF5.90904@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpython3  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: plpython3
List pgsql-hackers
> My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
> over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
> supporting a new version?
> 
> If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot.

Yeah, it's just my viewpoint that we don't want 2 python procedural
languages in core.  One should be in core, and one should go on
pgFoundry/PGAN.  Which ever one is "better" by some clear definition
should go in core.

As I said, I have no opinion about whether Pye's PLpython should replace
the existing because I'm in no position to judge.

--Josh Berkus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions