Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2009-11-05 at 19:24 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I'm planning to work on typed tables support. The idea is that you
>> create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way
>> around, which is currently done automatically).
>>
>> CREATE TYPE persons_type AS (name text, bdate date);
>>
>> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type;
>>
>> Or the fancy version:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type ( PRIMARY KEY (name) );
>
> And here is the first patch for that. The feature is complete as far as
> I had wanted it. I would like to add ALTER TYPE support, but that can
> come as a separate patch.
+1
ISTM that the ultimate would be a 'create table (...._) without storage'
(or some'm) and make 'create type' an alternate syntax for SQL
conformance. For various reasons, we've internally adopted using create
table for all composites and use a c-like naming convenstion of
appending _t to such beasts.
I'll just throw a little meat into the pack wolves....constraints....?
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
