Re: Testing with concurrent sessions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date
Msg-id 4B44F5EC020000250002DE4B@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Testing with concurrent sessions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Testing with concurrent sessions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane  wrote:
> We have not yet fully accepted the notion that you must have Perl
> to build (and, in fact, I am right now trying to verify that you
> don't).  I don't think that requiring Perl to test is going to fly.
Well, if that's the consensus, I have to choose between trying to
implement multi-session psql and using testing which can't carry over
to long-term regular use.  Are we anywhere close to an agreement on
what the multi-session psql implementation would look like?  (If not
I can put something forward.)
-Kevin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with PATHs having non-ASCII characters