Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 4B190BBD.8080403@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:52 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
>> BTW with VACUUM FULL removed I assume we're going to get rid of
>> HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OFF too, right?
> 
> Much as I would like to see those go, no. VF code should remain for some
> time yet, IMHO.

I don't think we need to keep VF code otherwise, but I would leave
HEAP_MOVED_IN/OFF support alone for now for in-place upgrade. Otherwise
we need a pre-upgrade script or something to scrub them off.

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication?
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO's gimme_tree function so that it always finds a