Re: RAID card recommendation - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: RAID card recommendation
Date
Msg-id 4B15D5C4.5040604@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RAID card recommendation  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Responses Re: RAID card recommendation  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Scott Carey wrote:
> 3ware 95xx and 96xx had performance somewhere between PERC 5 (horrid) and
> PERC 6 (mediocre) when I tested them with large SATA drives with RAID 10.
> Haven't tried raid 6 or 5.  Haven't tried the "SA" model that supports SAS
The only models I've tested and recommended lately are exactly those
though.  The 9690SA is the earliest 3ware card I've mentioned as seeming
to have reasonable performance.  The 95XX cards are certainly much
slower than similar models from, say, Areca.  I've never had one of the
earlier 96XX models to test.  Now you've got me wondering what the
difference between the earlier and current 96XX models really is.

--
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: RAID card recommendation
Next
From: Richard Neill
Date:
Subject: Re: Order by (for 15 rows) adds 30 seconds to query time