Re: CommitFest status/management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: CommitFest status/management
Date
Msg-id 4B1519C5.6080902@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest status/management  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: CommitFest status/management  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> It would also like to clarify the use case for this a little bit more.
>>  Is this just to track patches which committers are in the process of
>> committing (or have committed)?  Or would a committer potentially set
>> this on some patch that was still being reviewed, and if so would that
>> mean "don't review this any more because I'm taking over" or "I'm
>> planning to pick this up when the review process completes" or
>> something else?
>>     
>
> I am thinking we can just add a new status, "claimed by committer" and
> not bother about adding a new column with the committer name.
>
>   

I think it would be more flexible and useful to be able to "claim" it 
before the review is finished. It would mean in effect "I am following 
this and intend to commit it when it's ready".

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks