Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Oliver Jowett
Subject Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause
Date
Msg-id 4B0D3443.7050902@opencloud.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
Responses Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Oliver Jowett wrote:

> You never call getMoreResults(), so you are only looking at a single
> result, which is either a resultset or an update count, never both.

Also, looking at the code a bit more, RETURNING is a bit of a special
case. Normally, if you have a command that returns a resultset, the
command status is ignored (you generally don't care about the command
status of, for example, a SELECT). Presumably that's happening here too.
(But the advice regarding getMoreResults() is generally applicable, e.g.
if you have a multiple-statement query).

You may have more success using something like this:

>   PreparedStatement pstmt = con.prepareStatement("UPDATE something with no RETURNING clause", new String[] {
"some_column"}); 
>   int updateCount = pstmt.executeUpdate();
>   ResultSet results = pstmt.getGeneratedKeys();

The driver glues on an appropriate RETURNING clause and arranges for the
resulting resultset to appear via getGeneratedKeys(); the update count
should still appear as expected.

(I haven't actually tried this. caveat emptor)

-O

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: getUdateCount() vs. RETURNING clause