Re: BUG #5151: autovacuum process segfaults when max_fsm_pages are too low - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Boris Folgmann
Subject Re: BUG #5151: autovacuum process segfaults when max_fsm_pages are too low
Date
Msg-id 4B03C4BC.1030601@folgmann.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5151: autovacuum process segfaults when max_fsm_pages are too low  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #5151: autovacuum process segfaults when max_fsm_pages are too low  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Tom,

Tom Lane schrieb/wrote:
 > > Red Hat stopped supporting the RHEL-4 App Stack product awhile ago;
 > > since CentOS is evidently copying that, you should not hold your
 > > breath waiting for an update :-(.  However, as far as I can see

It seems that you are right, and I don't understand how they can stop
releasing important updates as RHEL4 is still supported.

 > > Or use Devrim's RPMs from postgresql.org (I think he has a build
 > > of 8.1.x for RHEL-4, though I could be wrong).

I've done that on 10 Nov 2009 and they're working perfectly. No autovac
crashes since then.
RedHat is very conservative concerning pgsql as my small table shows:

RHEL/CentOS     4.x    5.x
pgsql default    7.4    8.1
pgsql RHWAS    8.1    8.2

So I'm feeling very happy at the moment using your yum repositories and are
thinking about using an even more recent postgresql version in the future.
Is 8.4.1 ready for production or is it advisable to wait for one or two
updates?

tnx,
    boris

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: psql command line variables are unknown when -c SQL statement are executed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5151: autovacuum process segfaults when max_fsm_pages are too low