Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?
Date
Msg-id 4AFE24AF.1060308@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?  (Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?
List pgsql-performance
On 13/11/2009 2:29 PM, Dave Crooke wrote:

> Beware that VACUUM FULL locks an entire table at a time :-)

... and often bloats its indexes horribly. Use CLUSTER instead if you
need to chop a table that's massively bloated down to size; it'll be
much faster, and shouldn't leave the indexes in a mess.

I increasingly wonder what the purpose of VACUUM FULL in its current
form is.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kenny Gorman"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?