Re: [Newbie] UPDATE based on other table content - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniel Chiaramello
Subject Re: [Newbie] UPDATE based on other table content
Date
Msg-id 4AE9C373.5000803@golog.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Newbie] UPDATE based on other table content  (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thom Brown a écrit :


...
> 2009/10/29 Daniel Chiaramello <daniel.chiaramello@golog.net>:
>
>> Never mind, I found how finally:
>>
>> UPDATE
>>   product
>> SET
>>   qty = qty+s_count
>> FROM (
>>       SELECT
>>           intermediate.product_id,
>>           count(*) AS s_count
>>       FROM
>>           intermediate,
>>           orders
>>       WHERE
>>           orders.intermediate_id=intermediate.id
>>       GROUP BY
>>           intermediate.product_id
>>   ) AS summary
>> WHERE
>>   summary.product_id = product.id
>> ;
>>
>> Sorry for disturbance!
>> Daniel
>>
>>
> Your solution looks like it would perform a cumulative calculation.
> Surely you'd want qty = s_count?
>
> In any case, wouldn't you be better off not having a quantity column
> at all and just calculate it with either a query or a view?
>
> Example:
>
> SELECT product.id, COUNT(intermediate.product_id)
> FROM product
> LEFT JOIN intermediate ON product.id = intermediate.product_id
> GROUP BY product.id
> ORDER BY product.id
>
> Or include a product name in the product table to get more meaningful
> output.  You'd then get an output like:
>
> id    name    count
> 1    Orange    5
> 2    Apples    7
> 3    Pears    2
> 4    Kiwi    0
>
> If you don't want ones for which there have been no orders for (or
> whatever your intermediate table is for), use an INNER JOIN instead.
>
> Regards
>
> Thom
>
>
Thanks for anwer, but no, it's really adding the number of entries to my
"qty" field. The "orders" table is a transient one and is cleaned regularly.
Of course, the example I gave is a simplified one (there are no orders
or products, I chose these names to ease the understanding of my
problem) - in reality, the problem is much complicated than that :)

But thanks for answer anyways.

Daniel

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple identical calc and function in single query
Next
From: "Bob Pawley"
Date:
Subject: Can't connect