Re: Application name patch - v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Application name patch - v2
Date
Msg-id 4ADF254D.50801@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v2
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>   
>> (or whatever name we choose for this in place of PGAPPNAME.)
>>     
>
> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what
> Dave has been using in his examples.  The latter is too frickin
> long, and the double N is a typo threat (I already mistyped it in
> composing this message...)
>
>             
>   

Well, the latter argument suggests we should use an underscore ...

We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME  or some such?

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2