Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the real issue, though, is that answer
> to Ron's original question is "No". When backward compatibility gets
> in the way of cool new features, that's worth considering. But
> removing backward compatibility just for the sake of removing backward
> compatibility doesn't really buy us anything. It's basically doing
> extra work for no benefit and some possible harm.
>
>
>
Well said.
I am singularly unimpressed by arguments for removing backwards
compatibility features to satisfy someone's passion for neatness, or to
force people to conform to how they think their software should be
managed. I occasionally shake my head in amazement at the willingness of
some people to throw other users under the bus.
Upgrading a database installation is hard enough without us gratuitously
making it harder, and we positively don't want to make people stay on
older releases if they don't have to, I should have thought.
cheers
andrew
