Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC?
>>> I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default.
>>>
>
>
>> You have now. I have a client who sadly uses a non-default setting. And
>> on 8.4, what is more.
>>
>
> How critical is it to them? It would be nice to get rid of that source
> of variability.
>
> It would be possible to keep using old-style regexes even without the
> GUC, if they can interpose anything that can stick an "embedded options"
> prefix on the pattern strings. See 9.7.3.4:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-matching.html
>
>
>
They are probably quite open to changing it, but IIRC it is a setting
imposed by OpenACS, which is what they are based on.
cheers
andrew
