Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From KaiGai Kohei
Subject Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date
Msg-id 4AD67C56.3070508@ak.jp.nec.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>  Do you
>>> have any sense of how soon you'll feel confident to commit either
>>> patch?
>> I'm bad at estimating. Not this week for sure, and next week I'm
>> traveling and won't be able to spend as much time on it as I am right
>> now. If no new major issues are found, and all the outstanding issues
>> are resolved by me or Simon by then, maybe the week after that.
> 
> It's now the week after that, so unless you're in the process of
> typing that 'cvs commit' command, I'm going to move HS + SR out to the
> next CommitFest so that we can close this one out and stamp alpha2.
> 
> <brief pause for objections will now ensue>

I have a question.
When we register the postponed patches on the CF-Nov site again,
which tag should be choosen? "Needs Review"? or "Ready for Commiter"?

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)