Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date
Msg-id 4AD64265.2010807@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/14/09 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I tried making a functional index based on an expression
>>> containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a
>>> reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of
>>> normal?
>> regex_flavor affects its result.
> 
> Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC?
> I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default.

Actually, *we* (PGX) have a client who does.  You just haven't worked on
their stuff.

--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: What does this configure warning mean?
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords